08/30/2013 Jonathan Taylor

Another Men’s Center Forms, this Time at Lone Star College

Men’s centers and men’s groups are sprouting up across academia. They are not uniform in their scope. They may be run mostly by students, receive little funding, focus on general men’s issues, and just provide a place for men to hang out. Or they may be primarily run by a staff of faculty and one or more administrators, receive more funding (through a grant or community-wide donations), and focus on education, mentoring, and character-building.

The new men’s center at Lone Star College would fall in the latter category.

The Observer, a local newspaper, reports on the matter (my comments are interspersed):

Representatives from LSC-K and the community celebrated the opening of the Men’s Center Aug. 22, a first of its kind resource center for men where they can receive academic coaching, mentoring, journeymen meetings, fitness challenges, recreational activities and resources from the area including local agencies and services to help in times of need.

Excellent! Might I assume that “agencies and services to help in times of need” includes men who are at-risk of suicide, since men and boys make up 80% of suicides, a phenomenon which spikes among high school/college-age males ages 15-24? Or is it set up to help in times of financial need? Or is it just some good general counseling? Regardless, I very much like the acknowledgment that men can at times be people who are in need.

Passers-by might be tempted to regard the establishment of this men’s center as an isolated event. While it is true that the overwhelming majority of gender-based outreach in academia is geared toward helping women and girls, it would be dishonest of me to pretend the LSC Men’s Center was not connected to something larger than itself.

I remember seeing representatives from Lone Star College host one of the breakaway/roundtable sessions at the 2012 symposium hosted by Project MALES at UT Austin (I covered my observations over the course of attending three Project MALES symposia, as well as volunteer work, in an earlier post). LSC is also part of the network called the Texas Education Consortium for Male Students of Color, a network of higher education representatives which “seeks to stimulate new male-focused initiatives within Texas colleges and universities,” and launched in 2013 by Project MALES.

The article continues:

The Journeymen Meetings are thought provoking discussions that will cultivate a sense of personal purpose, enhance one’s understanding of manhood and encourage men to become leaders.

Quick question: what do you mean by “enhancing one’s understanding of manhood?” Do you mean that you intend to teach men how to “be men”? And if so, who gets to define what a “real man” is?

When I went to the 2012 Project MALES symposium, I was granted permission to read the curriculum of XY Zone, a mentoring program that at times encouraged male students to discuss the identity of manhood. Most such discussion questions in the curriculum were open-ended, seeming to allow each individual male student to decide what he thought a man should be. Open-ended questions, however, do leave more power up to the instructor than we may realize; I know from my tutoring days that non-directive questions – when done right – are often more effective and driving a point home than direct questions.

The Observer next reads:

“Boys to men, men to leaders and leaders to catalysts for change in our community; that is our mission,” Dr. Darrin Rankin, vice president of student success at LSC-K, said. “We intend to help our young men and not-so-young men to make better decisions and to be informed on important issues as well as understand that they matter. The Men’s Center is for all men which is important to say because even gay males need these resources and have the same commitments to their family and community.”

Ah, there we go: “the men’s center is for all men.” I admit, you had me worried there for a minute :). Let us continue:

The director of LSC-K’s Men’s Center will be Waymond Wesley who will work with the local school districts to encourage a college-going culture among men in the community.

“We are very excited about this new opportunity for our students. The Men’s Center has been a long time coming,” LSC-K President Dr. Katherine Persson said at the ceremony. “Through our research, we have found that fewer males than females finishing high school and even less males going into higher education. We need to meet these challenges before they get to a point where they will not continue with their education.

“With the data we found, we discovered that 60 percent of all degree holders nationally are female. If we are looking at the future and want to close the gap, we need to focus on our male population.”

 They formed a coalition with school districts where they have representation from the Humble, Splendora, New Caney and Cleveland Independent School Districts. They will have volunteers from these districts to work with Rankin and Wesley on holistic programs that serve men in the community.

They also hope the Men’s Center will be a place where they can talk with men about family and why it’s important as well as taking responsibility in the community.

They will also host forums and town hall-style gatherings where they have the opportunity to discuss issues that affect them.

“I am excited as I can be for the Men’s Center. Our mission is to provide comprehensive support services for men,” Wesley said. “We want to see men increase their academic achievement. There are some guys here who will be the first in their family to graduate from college; we want to be their resource and help them graduate. I am grateful for this opportunity to help men in our community become successful.”

For now, it seems that mentoring programs – something Project MALES and the LSC Men’s Center share – seem to be an attractive (if not preferred) option for schools that wish to do something for male students who are falling behind. As a further example of this preference, the website 100 Black Men of America lists over 100 mentoring programs offered by schools around the U.S. for black males. Why might mentoring be a preferred option?

Mentoring programs are less controversial than other education programs, such as single-sex classrooms and affirmative action (when some colleges began to offer affirmative action to male students, for example, they were investigated by the Civil Rights Commission). While they do have their advantages, such as the introduction of positive male role-models into the lives of young men who lack them, as well as helping students with academic work, they do possess a distinct flaw when it comes to mentoring males: you can establish and advertise as many mentoring programs as you want, but you can’t guarantee that male students will attend them. Many young men are socialized (if not biologically inclined) to resist acknowledging their own vulnerabilities, and hence are less likely than their female counterparts to initiate and follow through with help-seeking strategies.

This is also why they are the vast majority of suicides.

In 2010, when I was talking to Sarah Rodriguez (then the project coordinator for Project MALES) about mentoring programs, she explained to me the sometimes ethical dilemmas schools face in creating mentoring programs for males, namely: to what extent are schools authorized to tell young men that they must reject their social and biological programming as males? Should schools provide mentoring services for males that are purely academic in nature, or should such programs also actively seek to reconstruct the identities of their students along the lines of gender – sometimes including teaching them to reject some part of their upbringing – so that they would feel more comfortable asking for help in the first place? And how do coaches and mentors navigate any resistance they might encounter in teaching them to re-conceptualize what masculinity might be?

A tricky business.

Thus far we have covered some promising initiatives for men and boys in education. And yet, I must ask: why is it the case that groups like Project MALES and their affiliates have encountered very little political resistance in comparison with other groups?

For example, when Drs. Warren Farrell, Janice Fiamengo, Paul Nathanson, and Kathryn Young came to the University of Toronto to speak on men’s equity issues (including the decline of men and boys in education), Feminist protesters pulled fire alarms, barricaded doors, screamed, stomped, shouted, used noise-enhancing devices, and banged on walls right outside the lecture hall in order to prevent concerned parents, students, practitioners, and community stakeholders from attending and hearing their presentations. If you haven’t seen this video yet, you need to:


At Simon Fraser University, when students organized to form a men’s center, the opposition (as seen on YouTube) was so narrow-minded, hypocritical, apathetic, and sometimes mean-spirited that it inspired an article in the National Post titled “Shocking Anti-Male Hatred at Simon Fraser University.”

So what is the difference between these groups, and groups like Project MALES and other groups in the Consortium, that would lead to their being treated so differently?

The answer: the latter are staffed and run mainly by men of color, focus on men of color (mostly), and keep their focus primarily on education issues. The others, by contrast, generally maintain a race-neutral approach, are staffed by people whose demographic makeup is proportionate to the demographics of their location (primarily white men and women), and discuss not only academic underachievement, but also a wide range of men’s issues, including misandry (which in academia is primarily a Feminist phenomenon).

Also, this is Texas. Not Canada.

Most men’s issues do affect men and boys of color disproportionately, whether it is fatherlessness, false accusations, academic underachievement, homelessness, workplace-related injuries and deaths, over-incarceration, disparities in health and life-expectancy, and so forth. While society should not begrudge anyone acknowledging this, at some point, just as women have long advocated for women as women, we need to create a safe space in academia to advocate for men as men.

Lone Star College seems to be moving in that direction with its men’s center.

Jonathan Taylor
Follow me

Jonathan Taylor

Jonathan is Title IX For All's founder, editor, web designer, and database developer. Hailing from Texas, he makes a mean red beans n' rice and is always interested to learn new things.
Jonathan Taylor
Follow me
Share and rate this post:
 
Tagged: , , , ,

About the Author

Jonathan Taylor Jonathan is Title IX For All's founder, editor, web designer, and database developer. Hailing from Texas, he makes a mean red beans n' rice and is always interested to learn new things.

Comments (4)

  1. Average Person

    This is an exciting development. I hope to see this trend continue!

     
  2. “Most men’s issues do affect men and boys of color disproportionately, whether it is fatherlessness, false accusations, academic underachievement, homelessness, workplace-related injuries and deaths, over-incarceration, disparities in health and life-expectancy, and so forth.”

    I just want to note that this would be far more accurate if you had said “Most men’s issues do affect men and boys from different ethnicity differently…”

    What you said implies men not of color always have it better, this is fundamentally untrue even when dealing with ethnic groups let alone individual men.

    For example in the case of suicide Caucasians non Hispanic men are far more likely to successfully commit suicide than other ethnicities in the US. In fact other than Asian ethnicities they did so in 2010 at around 3 time the amount. Asian ethnicities also have a very high rate of suicide in men though at slightly behind non hispanic Caucasians.

    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6217a1.htm

    I really would prefer if we don’t start playing the race game. While it is true that issues will effect different men differently due to region race class and country. They are all men and every problem that effects men is a problem regardless.

     
    • Thank you for addressing suicide and providing stats in that regard.

      As far as the race issue goes, when someone says “most” (which I did), that’s a pretty good indicator that they don’t mean “always.”

      I agree, though, that the primary reason they are treated this way is because they are men, and in particular lower-class men. Which is why I closed the post by saying ” at some point, just as women have long advocated for women as women, we need to create a safe space in academia to advocate for men as men.”

      Most of the posts here will not deal with race at all. Project MALES, however, has made a point at times to say that these issues affect men of all races and dabbled a bit in presenting men’s rights as a broader concept of gender, and the LSC men’s center seems to be open to men of all races. That’s why I’m reporting on them.

       
  3. scott

    I read somewhere that in 1920 80 percent of black families were father led 2 parent households, and now its only 20 percent of black children who have father led 2 parent families.
    I define the terms matriarchy and patriarchy different than than American gender-feminists do and “Quack-ademics” do…
    As in.. there are now developing two distinct classes of people in the US, the ones with fathers in their lives ( I call the educated orderly…”the patriarchy”), and the ones with no father in their lives ( The troubled, insecure, uneducated… “the matriarchy”).
    Maybe these new mens groups can help lift young boys out of the perpetual matriarchy.

     

Comments are closed.