While schools, accuser advocates, etc., often argue the names of those accused of sexual assault should be public information, they demand privacy for the names of faculty and staff who act as decision-makers in their cases. Example: the recent decision in Doe v. Syracuse University.
In a 45-page ruling granting and denying summary judgment, Judge Thomas McAvoy also ruled that the newspaper Daily Orange may access previously sealed documents – so long as the names of faculty and staff who acted as decision-makers in the student disciplinary hearing are redacted.
Case updated in our Title IX Lawsuit Database.
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
About the Author
Related Posts
While schools, accuser advocates, etc., often argue the names of those accused of sexual assault should be public information, they demand privacy for the names of faculty and staff who act as decision-makers in their cases. Example: the recent decision in Doe v. Syracuse University.
In a 45-page ruling granting and denying summary judgment, Judge Thomas McAvoy also ruled that the newspaper Daily Orange may access previously sealed documents – so long as the names of faculty and staff who acted as decision-makers in the student disciplinary hearing are redacted.
Case updated in our Title IX Lawsuit Database.
Thank You for Reading
If you like what you have read, feel free to sign up for our newsletter here:
More from Title IX for All
Advisors for Accused Students
We can help you craft and execute a defense strategy at any stage—from report to investigation to adjudication—with the goal of achieving the best possible outcome.
Accused Students Database
A feature-rich database of lawsuits by accused higher ed students alleging schools violated their rights while investigating sexual misconduct claims.
